Anti Wage-Slavery Pro-Freedom Quotations Of The Week 1440-1442
...many of those same global elite
have argued that we cannot afford to provide education, healthcare or a
basic standard of living for all, much less eradicate poverty or
dramatically enhance the social safety net by guaranteeing every American a
subsistence-level income.
The Tax Justice Network estimates
the global elite are sitting on $21–32tn of untaxed assets. Clearly, only a
portion of that is owed to the US or any other nation in taxes – the highest
tax bracket in the US is 39.6% of income. …
A larger income, to ensure that
no American fell into absolute abject poverty – say, $12,000 a year – would
cost around $3.6tn. That is a big number, but one that once again seems far
more reasonable when considered through the lens of the Panama Papers and the
scandal of global tax evasion. Because the truth is that we have all been
robbed, systematically, by the world’s wealthiest people, for decades. They
have used those stolen dollars to build yet more wealth for themselves, and all
the while we have been arguing with ourselves over what to do with the leftover
pennies.
The Panama Papers prove it: America can afford a universal basic income
The Panama Papers prove it: America can afford a universal basic income
Colin Holtz
theguardian
[emphasis JS]
Households with children under 18
were at greater risk than households without children. Across the country,
nearly one-third of lone-parent families headed by women were food insecure.
Other household characteristics associated with food insecurity included low
income, being Aboriginal, being Black, and renting rather than owning one’s
home.
While being on social assistance
was a major risk factor, the majority of the food secure households in
Canada were reliant on employment income.
“We know that social assistance
recipients are particularly vulnerable, and the latest numbers show rates of
food insecurity as high as 82% among people reliant on social assistance in
Nova Scotia and 83% among those in Nunavut. At the same time, we shouldn’t lose
sight of the fact that the majority of food insecure households in our
country are working families.” said Naomi Dachner, co-author of the report.
PROOF
At present machinery competes against man [sic]. Under proper
conditions machinery will serve man. There is no doubt at all that this is
the future of machinery, and just as trees grow while the country gentleman is
asleep, so while Humanity will be amusing itself, or enjoying cultivated
leisure – which, and not labour, is the aim of man – or making
beautiful things, or reading beautiful things, or simply contemplating the
world with admiration and delight, machinery will be doing all the necessary
and unpleasant work. The fact is, that civilisation requires slaves. The Greeks
were quite right there. Unless there are slaves to do the ugly, horrible,
uninteresting work, culture and contemplation become almost impossible. Human
slavery is wrong, insecure, and demoralising. On mechanical slavery, on the
slavery of the machine, the future of the world depends. And when
scientific men are no longer called upon to go down to a depressing East End
and distribute bad cocoa and worse blankets to starving people, they will have
delightful leisure in which to devise wonderful and marvellous things for their
own joy and the joy of everyone else. There will be great storages of force for
every city, and for every house if required, and this force man will convert
into heat, light, or motion, according to his needs. Is this Utopian? A map of
the world that does not include Utopia is not worth even glancing at, for it
leaves out the one country at which Humanity is always landing. And when Humanity
lands there, it looks out, and, seeing a better country, sets sail. Progress is
the realisation of Utopias.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home